The House Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability will end its investigation into Vice President Sara Duterte’s use of confidential funds on Monday, announced Manila 3rd District Representative Joel Chua.
Why is the Probe Ending?
Committee Chair Joel Chua explained that wrapping up the investigation would allow the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) to begin their own probe. There are allegations that two military officers received portions of the confidential funds from the Vice President’s offices.
“To clarify the issue and give way to the AFP’s investigation, we will step aside and let them conduct their probe,” Chua said during a radio interview.
Another reason for ending the inquiry is the impeachment complaints filed against Vice President Duterte. Chua stated that the investigation should not be misused and emphasized its primary purpose is to aid legislation.
“We decided to conclude this investigation to prevent it from being used for other purposes, especially now that impeachment complaints have been filed,” Chua added.
Impeachment Complaints Filed
Two impeachment complaints are currently lodged against the Vice President:
- First Complaint: Filed by advocacy groups and endorsed by Akbayan Party-list Representative Perci Cendaña.
- Second Complaint: Submitted by the Makabayan bloc.
If these complaints progress, the House Committee on Justice will take over the investigation.
Focus on Legislative Measures
Monday’s final hearing will be an open session, with panel members discussing legislative measures to address issues surrounding confidential funds.
- Stricter Rules for Special Disbursing Officers (SDOs):
The panel is pushing for tougher requirements to ensure only qualified individuals are appointed as SDOs.- “Being an SDO is a heavy responsibility and cannot be assigned carelessly,” said Chua.
- Limitations on Confidential Funds:
- Only agencies directly involved in intelligence, national security, or peace and order should receive confidential funds.
- “Agencies without roles in these areas should not have access to such funds,” Chua stressed.
- Accountability for Misuse:
- The panel recommends that confidential funds flagged for misuse (via a notice of disallowance) should lose their confidential status, making them open to thorough investigation.
- “When flagged, these funds should no longer remain confidential,” said Chua.
What Happens Next?
The House panel’s closure will pave the way for the AFP to begin its investigation. Meanwhile, lawmakers will focus on passing laws to ensure tighter controls over confidential funds and their disbursement.
This move reflects efforts to maintain transparency and accountability, ensuring public funds are used appropriately.
